Fujifilm has a strategy problem they need to fix

The latest release of the X-T3 is a good and bad problem to have for Fujifilm.

On one hand they have released a camera that is likely to restore Fujifilm’s reputation after the X-H1’s release was overshadowed by Sony’s release of the A7iii. With this release, Fujifilm did a good enough job on the X-T3 to ensure that not even the release of two prominent full frame cameras from Nikon and canon could overshadow their announcement. It’s a damn good camera with very little to complain about.

This being the case, what exactly is the problem?

The X-H1…

If you have a look at the forums, there is a consistent issue arising. With the X-T3 being so good, where exactly does the X-H1 fit it. Despite what people think, it wasn’t a video camera, it was Fujifilm’s attempt at a professional camera. The X-T3 on the other hand is a better stills AND video camera so their “high-end” camera just got overshadowed by a lower model and that is raising some heads.

The consensus from most people is simple: Fujifilm should have waited 6 months and put the new sensor in! Fujifilm knew the new sensor was coming, they wouldn’t have been developing the X-T3 blindly so I would be questioning who made the call to put that sensor in and whether there was any actual thought behind it because it could turn out to be a death nail in the X-H1 coffin.

Past decisions aside, Fujifilm have a problem to fix and they need to do it quickly. Those looking for IBIS and the new sensor won’t find it in the X-T3 and for potential switchers that may be a problem. If I was sitting on with Nikon or Canon, disappointed with the current releases, and trying to decide which way to go, Sony still has an advantage with IBIS and far better battery life and even Nikon has put IBIS in their new mirrorless. For potential switchers, this offers compelling reasons to switch and the Sony glass in the equivalent apertures (i.e. 24-70 f4 vs 16-55 f/2.8) isn’t actually much bigger than Fujifilm so the size argument is mute.

But its not only potential switchers that are confused. It’s current X-H1 owners who are scratching their heads at Fujifilm’s strategy and asking “where to now?”.

If Fujifilm continue their previous trend of releasing the X-H2 18 months after the X-T3, I won’t be a buyer of it and neither will 50% of the X-H1 buyers, so the line is essentially dead.

Advertisements

I was wrong and I get it now – The instagram dilemma

I wrote an article previously about why I wasn’t planning to split my Instagram accounts. The logic was simple, “I don’t care about what other people think about my accounts because it’s a reflection of where I am at as a photographer”.

In theory it sounds great, and as someone not worrying about ever taking an account down a commercial path but there was one minor issue with my plan. After discussions with a friend is who an Instagram guru, there are times when you want to constrain your account and it’s not about followers and what people think of your account, it’s something different which is the value you get out of your account. Continue reading I was wrong and I get it now – The instagram dilemma

Why the X100 isn’t the best Point & Shoot

It may seem like a bad thing to say, but it’s the truth, and I think it’s time to be honest about it. The X100 series is not the best Point & Shoot (P&S) on the market. It never was.

Part of the challenge with the X100 series is the appeal. It’s built a reputation as “the” P&S camera to carry and as a result, there are a lot of people buying them that really shouldn’t be. There is this perception that the X100 will take amazing photos and obviously it will, but it won’t for everyone.

20180712-DSCF6744 6000 x 4000

I’m not trying to be exclusive. This is not an attempt to try be part of a special club of X100 owners that you can’t be part of. Fujifilm products were never about exclusivity, if you want that, go to Leica. This is about practicality, ease of use and customer experience. It’s like a mum or dad buying a Nikon D5, leaving it in P mode and wondering why he / she is getting terrible photos. It’s about bad choices.

The problem in this case is that the X100 is not just a P&S, it’s a photographer’s P&S. There is no switch to “Auto” button with scene modes that the lesser beasts like the X70 have. You can’t switch it to sports mode and expect it to take good photos of your kids playing on the grass. Use it in auto (aperture auto, shutter auto, ISO auto) and you’ll get worse outcomes than a camera designed to do the work for you. The X100 doesn’t want to do the driving, it wants you to do the driving and it expects you to know how to drive. The X100 is a sports car without ABS and traction control being driven on wet roads. Obviously cameras don’t kill people so I’m being a little over dramatic but you get the idea.

20180712-DSCF6765 6000 x 4000

I don’t blame Fujifilm, they aren’t marketing this as a beginners camera. Blaming the stores would be incorrect, I’ve never seen stores pushing X100’s down the throat of consumers. 90% of the time, the blame falls on the consumer, fair and square. Mr Consumer walks in and insists on buying a specific model based on what a friend told them and won’t listen to common sense.

20180712-DSCF6739 6000 x 4000

So what do you do if you’re a novice and you bought one?

Take the time to learn how to use it. Take the time to do a basic photography course that teaches you about how to get out of auto mode. Learn how to shoot raw, when you do so, you’ll find it’s an incredible camera and it deserves better than to be left in P mode it’s entire life hoping it will get better.

X70/X100 Square Hood

This is the square hood from squarehood.se for the X70 and X100 which is a plastic hood available to purchase online.

Really like the size of it, and the style of hood which is similar to the XF16mm and XF23mm style hood which I prefer over the Haoge style after market hoods for the X100.

Keep an eye out for @gregcromie review of this coming soon. Continue reading X70/X100 Square Hood

Is Eye-AF the solution to Fujifilm’s problems?

Introduction

I’ve toyed with the title of this article. Technically, this isn’t about eye-AF, it’s about a simplification of Fujifilm’s autofocus. The reason for this is I don’t think eye-AF is the complete solution to user problems, at least not entirely. It’s a great feature, and Sony’s facial preference technology (which gives preference to specific people) is the kind of technology that is helpful for some scenarios, but the real reason for the – popularity of eye-AF is the ability of the AF to decide the appropriate starting point for autofocus. In essence it’s the simplification of the AF system, and by simplification, I mean dumb it down to get better results without losing performance.

The current Fujifilm AF system is great but it requires constant customisation to get the best out of it, and most users don’t know how to do it, nor do they want to. You could argue that cameras are technical pieces of equipment, but in the land of iPads and Google, technical devices are becoming increasingly simple. For that reason, AF needs to be incredibly powerful and simple at the same time like ABS, traction control and similar technologies that are both powerful and simple.

Continue reading Is Eye-AF the solution to Fujifilm’s problems?

Lumu – pricing themselves out of the market

I was looking to get a light meter so I decided to investigate something called a Lumu, which is an iPhone lightning attachment based light meter. It’s a clever concept, you get a small attachment that looks like the top of a light meter and attach it to the lightning connector on your iPhone. Continue reading Lumu – pricing themselves out of the market

The dilemma of the overpriced OEM batteries

I’m going to write a generic article for this, it’s not a targeted attack on Fujifilm because I don’t believe this is something that only Fujifilm customers suffer as a result of. This is something that all the vendors do, Nikon, Canon, Fujifilm, etc. The challenge with mirrorless users is that we feel the pain a little more, because we need about 3 batteries for every one DSLR users require.

Please don’t get me wrong. I appreciate the cost of developing technology. I appreciate there are development cycles. But lets be realistic here, a battery shouldn’t cost $120. A Nikon battery shouldn’t cost that, a Fujifilm battery shouldn’t cost that and a Canon battery shouldn’t cost that. If one of the manufacturers came up with the same size battery with 3 times the capacity, I’d pay that, it’s worthwhile, it’s innovative, but there is nothing innovative about the same capacity battery that gives 320 shots on a mirrorless camera, with the same stuff rolled out year after year and only minor improvements. I understand that third party vendors are providing batteries without having to bear to cost of development, but when I can buy 4 or in some cases 5 batteries for the same price, I have to start calling it what it is, extortion, and they also wouldn’t have to pay for development because the OEM’s aren’t innovating to start with.

As I mentioned, this becomes more noticeable with mirrorless because while you can get away buying one or two extra batteries for DSLR, when you are talking about 10, it’s jut not feasible to look at OEM in it’s current form. To put it into perspective, you could spend half the amount on third party batteries, get twice as many batteries and still cover the risk over something going wrong.

For a wedding photographer shooting, it could be the problem of having 16 batteries with two cameras, at $100 a pop, you’re talking about $1,400 worth of extra batteries, which is nearly the cost of an X-T2 on batteries. Compare that to third party batteries and you’re talking about $300 vs $1400, and that’s decent branded third party batteries. Again, for $600 I could buy twice as many batteries for half the price, be able to do two events in a row, and on the odd chance a battery fails completely, I could simply call on one of my backups.

So if the OEM’s are out there listening to this, you need to rethink your strategy. The market for non-OEM batties has been created solely by you, like the market for illegal music was created in the early days by the lack of electronic downloads, or selling albums when people only wanted a song. You can try reduce the use third party batteries through firmware, warning messages, but ultimately you’re just putting a bandaid on a problem, not solving it.

When you bring that pricing down to reasonable levels, the market for OEM batteries will increase. Alternatively, show us you’re producing much higher capacity batteries and we may rethink our strategy.